[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-11578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17769524#comment-17769524
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on YARN-11578:
---------------------------------------

tomicooler opened a new pull request, #6120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6120

   The check introduced in YARN-10901 to avoid a warn message in NN logs in 
certain situations (when /tmp/logs is not owned by the yarn user), but it adds 
3 NameNode calls (create, setpermission, delete) during log aggregation 
collection, for every NM.
   Meaning, when a YARN job completes, at the YARN log aggregation phase this 
check is done for every job, from every NodeManager.
   
   In 30 minutes 4.2 % of all the NameNode calls were due to this in a cluster. 
"write" calls need a Namesystem writeLock as well, so the impact is bigger.
   
   Change-Id: I65468aa972860d3b62050fcb41b8b06e417ee8bb
   
   <!--
     Thanks for sending a pull request!
       1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
       2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g., 
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   ### Description of PR
   
   Added a static concurrent cache that maps the `<FS class type + Log Path>` 
to the check `result`.
   
   **Two assumptions:**
    - the permissions won't change while the NMs are running
    - the key <FS class + Log Path> won't grow big
   
   If these two assumptions are not met, we might need to come up with a 
different idea.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   Added some debug for demo:
   ```
          final FsLogPathKey key = new FsLogPathKey(remoteFS.getClass(), 
qualified);
          FileSystem finalRemoteFS = remoteFS;
   +      System.out.println("checking logdir " + qualified);
          FS_CHMOD_CACHE.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> {
   +        System.out.println("      computeIfAbsent " + qualified);
            fsSupportsChmod = checkFsSupportsChmod(finalRemoteFS, 
remoteRootLogDir, qualified);
            return fsSupportsChmod;
          });
   ```
   
   Added some extra calls to `testRemoteDirCreationWithCustomUser`, the actual 
checking is only done once:
   ```
   checking logdir /tmp/logs
         computeIfAbsent /tmp/logs
   checking logdir /tmp/logs
   checking logdir /tmp/logs
   checking logdir /tmp/logs
   ```
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [x] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'YARN-11578. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   




> Fix performance issue of permission check in verifyAndCreateRemoteLogDir
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-11578
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-11578
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tamas Domok
>            Assignee: Tamas Domok
>            Priority: Major
>
> YARN-10901 introduced a check to avoid a warn message in NN logs in certain 
> situations (when /tmp/logs is not owned by the yarn user), but it adds 3 
> NameNode calls (create, setpermission, delete) during log aggregation 
> collection, for *every* NM. Meaning, when a YARN job completes, at the YARN 
> log aggregation phase this check is done for every job, from every 
> NodeManager.
> In 30 minutes 4.2 % of all the NameNode calls were due to this in a cluster. 
> "write" calls need a Namesystem writeLock as well, so the impact is bigger.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to