[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13924646#comment-13924646
]
Xuan Gong commented on YARN-445:
--------------------------------
Can we not use
{code}
signal <container ID [signal number]> Signal the container. Default signal
number is 3
{code}
Can we use something like:
{code}
signal <containerId> SIGKILL/SIGTERM
{code}
SIGKILL, SIGTERM, etc are in SignalContainerCMD enum.
And let NM to figure out what is the right command for SIGKILL, SIGTERM, etc
based on the OS type ?
> Ability to signal containers
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-445
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: nodemanager
> Reporter: Jason Lowe
> Assignee: Andrey Klochkov
> Attachments: MRJob.png, MRTasks.png, YARN-445--n2.patch,
> YARN-445--n3.patch, YARN-445--n4.patch, YARN-445.patch, YARNContainers.png
>
>
> It would be nice if an ApplicationMaster could send signals to contaniers
> such as SIGQUIT, SIGUSR1, etc.
> For example, in order to replicate the jstack-on-task-timeout feature
> implemented by MAPREDUCE-1119 in Hadoop 0.21 the NodeManager needs an
> interface for sending SIGQUIT to a container. For that specific feature we
> could implement it as an additional field in the StopContainerRequest.
> However that would not address other potential features like the ability for
> an AM to trigger jstacks on arbitrary tasks *without* killing them. The
> latter feature would be a very useful debugging tool for users who do not
> have shell access to the nodes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
