[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13980159#comment-13980159
 ] 

Abin Shahab commented on YARN-1964:
-----------------------------------

Wangda Tan, I like your suggestion. The patch that I've posted has a version of 
the DefaultContainerExecutor that launches Docker. Right now the Executor type 
and Container names can be changed only on yarn-site.xml. However, I would like 
to move it down to the job configuration so that we can achieve what've said: 
For matlab jobs, users would specify the matlab container in their jobconf, for 
their regular mapred job, they would specify yarn containers.

Junping Du, I agree with the idea of a generic executor. The 
LinuxContainerExecutor can be extended to launch docker. However, we have to 
work out how the resource-isolation management is handled between docker and 
CgroupsLCEResourcesHandler.

Thanks for the feedback!

> Support Docker containers in YARN
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1964
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1964
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Arun C Murthy
>            Assignee: Abin Shahab
>         Attachments: yarn-1964-branch-2.2.0-docker.patch
>
>
> Docker (https://www.docker.io/) is, increasingly, a very popular container 
> technology.
> In context of YARN, the support for Docker will provide a very elegant 
> solution to allow applications to *package* their software into a Docker 
> container (entire Linux file system incl. custom versions of perl, python 
> etc.) and use it as a blueprint to launch all their YARN containers with 
> requisite software environment. This provides both consistency (all YARN 
> containers will have the same software environment) and isolation (no 
> interference with whatever is installed on the physical machine).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to