[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13994886#comment-13994886
 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-556:
----------------------------------------------

Tx for the community update, Karthik.

Also, Jian/Abhinav, can you both please file all the known sub-tasks and assign 
things to yourselves according as you are working on them rightaway? Other 
folks like [~ozawa] and [~rohithsharma] have been requesting repeatedly 
expressed interest to work on this feature. It'll be great to find stuff for 
everyone instead of creating all tickets and assigning them to the two of you. 
Thanks.

[~ozawa] and [~rohithsharma], let others know what you specifically want to 
work on, if you have something in mind.

bq.  6. clustertimestamp is added to containerId so that containerId after RM 
restart do not clash with containerId before (as the containerId counter resets 
to zero in memory)
I totally missed this line item. Can you throw more detail on what the problem 
is and what the proposal is? What is done in the prototype patch is a major 
compatibility issue - I'd like to avoid it if we can.

> RM Restart phase 2 - Work preserving restart
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-556
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-556
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Bikas Saha
>            Assignee: Bikas Saha
>         Attachments: Work Preserving RM Restart.pdf, 
> WorkPreservingRestartPrototype.001.patch
>
>
> YARN-128 covered storing the state needed for the RM to recover critical 
> information. This umbrella jira will track changes needed to recover the 
> running state of the cluster so that work can be preserved across RM restarts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to