[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14003960#comment-14003960
 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-2074:
-----------------------------------------------

[~sunilg], Agree that as much as possible we should avoid killing the AM during 
preemption and so we should look at YARN-2022 orthogonally. This one focuses 
only on the point that in the case that this cannot be avoided, it shouldn't be 
accounted towards AM failures.

> Preemption of AM containers shouldn't count towards AM failures
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2074
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2074
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Jian He
>
> One orthogonal concern with issues like YARN-2055 and YARN-2022 is that AM 
> containers getting preempted shouldn't count towards AM failures and thus 
> shouldn't eventually fail applications.
> We should explicitly handle AM container preemption/kill as a separate issue 
> and not count it towards the limit on AM failures.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to