[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14015763#comment-14015763
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2119:
---------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12647959/YARN-2119.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-web-proxy.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3888//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3888//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Fix the DEFAULT_PROXY_ADDRESS used for getBindAddress to fix 1590
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2119
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2119
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Anubhav Dhoot
> Assignee: Anubhav Dhoot
> Attachments: YARN-2119.patch
>
>
> The fix for [YARN-1590|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1590]
> introduced an method to get web proxy bind address with the incorrect default
> port. Because all the users of the method (only 1 user) ignores the port, its
> not breaking anything yet. Fixing it in case someone else uses this in the
> future.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
