[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14019581#comment-14019581
]
Jian He commented on YARN-2030:
-------------------------------
I see, thanks for the update. Maybe just promote getProto() to the abstract
class, given this record is used internally by RM only? should be fine?
> Use StateMachine to simplify handleStoreEvent() in RMStateStore
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2030
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2030
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Junping Du
> Assignee: Binglin Chang
> Attachments: YARN-2030.v1.patch, YARN-2030.v2.patch,
> YARN-2030.v3.patch
>
>
> Now the logic to handle different store events in handleStoreEvent() is as
> following:
> {code}
> if (event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.STORE_APP)
> || event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.UPDATE_APP)) {
> ...
> if (event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.STORE_APP)) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
> ...
> try {
> if (event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.STORE_APP)) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
> }
> ...
> } else if (event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.STORE_APP_ATTEMPT)
> || event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.UPDATE_APP_ATTEMPT)) {
> ...
> if (event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.STORE_APP_ATTEMPT)) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
> ...
> if (event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.STORE_APP_ATTEMPT)) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
> }
> ...
> } else if (event.getType().equals(RMStateStoreEventType.REMOVE_APP)) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
> }
> {code}
> This is not only confuse people but also led to mistake easily. We may
> leverage state machine to simply this even no state transitions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
