[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14048333#comment-14048333
]
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-2001:
-----------------------------------------------
+1 for the general idea. I suppose you will implement the node-threshold
separately?
There are a lot of reasons why it makes sense for scheduler to pause for a
while. Mind adding some of them here and to the config documentation?
Insufficient state etc.. Are there more issues?
It'd be great to add some tests too.
> Threshold for RM to accept requests from AM after failover
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2001
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2001
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: resourcemanager
> Reporter: Jian He
> Assignee: Jian He
> Attachments: YARN-2001.1.patch
>
>
> After failover, RM may require a certain threshold to determine whether it’s
> safe to make scheduling decisions and start accepting new container requests
> from AMs. The threshold could be a certain amount of nodes. i.e. RM waits
> until a certain amount of nodes joining before accepting new container
> requests. Or it could simply be a timeout, only after the timeout RM accepts
> new requests.
> NMs joined after the threshold can be treated as new NMs and instructed to
> kill all its containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)