[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14066195#comment-14066195
 ] 

Zhijie Shen commented on YARN-2301:
-----------------------------------

bq. As attempt Id is not shown on console, this is easier for user to just copy 
the appId and run it, may also be useful for container-preserving AM restart.

You can run yarn appattempt to get the attempt. Anyway it's arguable if it is 
user friendly or not. Given adding a function, I vote for yarn container -list 
<appId>

One more comment. “yarn container” can source the container information either 
from RM or from timeline server. When making the changes, please make sure the 
both sides are changed consistently

> Improve yarn container command
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2301
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2301
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jian He
>            Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
>              Labels: usability
>
> While running yarn container -list <Application Attempt ID> command, some 
> observations:
> 1) the scheme (e.g. http/https  ) before LOG-URL is missing
> 2) the start-time is printed as milli seconds (e.g. 1405540544844). Better to 
> print as time format.
> 3) finish-time is 0 if container is not yet finished. May be "N/A"
> 4) May have an option to run as yarn container -list <appId> OR  yarn 
> application -list-containers <appId> also.  
> As attempt Id is not shown on console, this is easier for user to just copy 
> the appId and run it, may  also be useful for container-preserving AM 
> restart. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to