[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14097280#comment-14097280
 ] 

Sunil G commented on YARN-2390:
-------------------------------

Yes. I understood your idea, but completed apps can be there in RM for some 
more time (10000 is default number of completed apps in RM). and ACL's will be 
applicable for these completed apps still. 
In History Server, behavior now is different for same completed app once its 
moved from RM. This was the only point i was thinking we may need to look to. 
What  do you feel about this?


> Investigating whehther generic history service needs to support queue-acls
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>
> According YARN-1250,  it's arguable whether queue-acls should be applied to 
> the generic history service as well, because the queue admin may not need the 
> access to the completed application that is removed from the queue. Create 
> this ticket to tackle the discussion around.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to