[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14100253#comment-14100253
]
Jian He commented on YARN-415:
------------------------------
bq. an attempt can be in the complete state before all of its containers are
finished
CapacityScheduler#doneApplicationAttempt(FairScheduler#removeApplicationAttempt)
are synchronously finishing all the live containers. so I think all containers
should be guaranteed to finish before attempt finishes.
bq. charging the running containers to the current app until the containers
finish will be seemless to the end user.
Particularly in work-preserving AM restart, current AM is actually the one
who's managing previous running containers. Running containers in scheduler are
already transferred to the current AM. So running containers metrics are
transferred as well. I think it'll be confusing if finished containers are
still charged back against the previous dead attempt. Btw, YARN-1809 will add
the attempt web page where we could show attempt-specific metrics also.
Regarding the problem of metrics persistency. Agree that it doesn't solve the
problem for running apps in general. Maybe we can have the state store changes
in a separate jira and discuss more there, so that we can get this in first.
> Capture memory utilization at the app-level for chargeback
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-415
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-415
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: resourcemanager
> Affects Versions: 0.23.6
> Reporter: Kendall Thrapp
> Assignee: Andrey Klochkov
> Attachments: YARN-415--n10.patch, YARN-415--n2.patch,
> YARN-415--n3.patch, YARN-415--n4.patch, YARN-415--n5.patch,
> YARN-415--n6.patch, YARN-415--n7.patch, YARN-415--n8.patch,
> YARN-415--n9.patch, YARN-415.201405311749.txt, YARN-415.201406031616.txt,
> YARN-415.201406262136.txt, YARN-415.201407042037.txt,
> YARN-415.201407071542.txt, YARN-415.201407171553.txt,
> YARN-415.201407172144.txt, YARN-415.201407232237.txt,
> YARN-415.201407242148.txt, YARN-415.201407281816.txt,
> YARN-415.201408062232.txt, YARN-415.201408080204.txt,
> YARN-415.201408092006.txt, YARN-415.201408132109.txt,
> YARN-415.201408150030.txt, YARN-415.patch
>
>
> For the purpose of chargeback, I'd like to be able to compute the cost of an
> application in terms of cluster resource usage. To start out, I'd like to
> get the memory utilization of an application. The unit should be MB-seconds
> or something similar and, from a chargeback perspective, the memory amount
> should be the memory reserved for the application, as even if the app didn't
> use all that memory, no one else was able to use it.
> (reserved ram for container 1 * lifetime of container 1) + (reserved ram for
> container 2 * lifetime of container 2) + ... + (reserved ram for container n
> * lifetime of container n)
> It'd be nice to have this at the app level instead of the job level because:
> 1. We'd still be able to get memory usage for jobs that crashed (and wouldn't
> appear on the job history server).
> 2. We'd be able to get memory usage for future non-MR jobs (e.g. Storm).
> This new metric should be available both through the RM UI and RM Web
> Services REST API.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
