[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14100724#comment-14100724
 ] 

Sunil G commented on YARN-2390:
-------------------------------

Hi [~zjshen]

bq. is the right fix to be correcting the ACLs on RM side?
+1. Yes, I also feel it will be better if we remove the ACL checks for those 
apps which are completed from RM side.

If the rmApp state is not *FinalApplicationStatus.UNDEFINED*, such applications 
must have been moved to FAILED/SUCCEEDED/KILLED. queue ACLs for such 
applications  need not have to be checked. *ClientRMService#checkAccess* can be 
modified with this change. If this approach is fine, I would like to take over 
this JIRA. Kindly let me know your suggestion.


> Investigating whehther generic history service needs to support queue-acls
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>
> According YARN-1250,  it's arguable whether queue-acls should be applied to 
> the generic history service as well, because the queue admin may not need the 
> access to the completed application that is removed from the queue. Create 
> this ticket to tackle the discussion around.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to