Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-2928:

bq. On the process side, I propose we do work on a branch with a goal to borrow 
whatever code is possible to from current Timeline service.
Don't see any concerns on this. Creating a branch now and will get people 
participating in this branch to be branch committers if they aren't already 
committers. Irrespective of that, I think we should simply see it as RTC on 
branch - a JIRA for every task, patches uploaded to JIRA and reviewed/committed 
by someone else etc.

> Application Timeline Server (ATS) next gen: phase 1
> ---------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-2928
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2928
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: timelineserver
>            Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>            Assignee: Sangjin Lee
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: ATSv2.rev1.pdf, ATSv2.rev2.pdf
> We have the application timeline server implemented in yarn per YARN-1530 and 
> YARN-321. Although it is a great feature, we have recognized several critical 
> issues and features that need to be addressed.
> This JIRA proposes the design and implementation changes to address those. 
> This is phase 1 of this effort.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to