[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14284382#comment-14284382
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-3026:
---------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12692338/YARN-3026.2.patch
against trunk revision c94c0d2.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 4 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/6366//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/6366//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Move application-specific container allocation logic from LeafQueue to
> FiCaSchedulerApp
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3026
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Wangda Tan
> Assignee: Wangda Tan
> Attachments: YARN-3026.1.patch, YARN-3026.2.patch
>
>
> Have a discussion with [~vinodkv] and [~jianhe]:
> In existing Capacity Scheduler, all allocation logics of and under LeafQueue
> are located in LeafQueue.java in implementation. To make a cleaner scope of
> LeafQueue, we'd better move some of them to FiCaSchedulerApp.
> Ideal scope of LeafQueue should be: when a LeafQueue receives some resources
> from ParentQueue (like 15% of cluster resource), and it distributes resources
> to children apps, and it should be agnostic to internal logic of children
> apps (like delayed-scheduling, etc.). IAW, LeafQueue shouldn't decide how
> application allocating container from given resources.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
