[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14292327#comment-14292327
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-3028:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12694596/0003-YARN-3028.patch
against trunk revision 7574df1.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common:
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.TestResourceTrackerOnHA
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.client.TestApplicationClientProtocolOnHA
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/6419//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/6419//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Better syntax for replace label CLI
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3028
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: api, client, resourcemanager
> Reporter: Jian He
> Assignee: Rohith
> Attachments: 0001-YARN-3028.patch, 0002-YARN-3028.patch,
> 0003-YARN-3028.patch
>
>
> The command to replace label now is such:
> {code}
> yarn rmadmin -replaceLabelsOnNode [node1:port,label1,label2
> node2:port,label1,label2]
> {code}
> Instead of {code} node1:port,label1,label2 {code} I think it's better to say
> {code} node1:port=label1,label2 {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
