[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14343867#comment-14343867
]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-2069:
----------------------------------
This comment makes sense to me, maybe YARN-2113 should be a correct place to
implement logics for respecting user share. [~mayank_bansal], is it possible,
could you rebase the patch against latest trunk? I can take a look again.
Thanks,
Wangda
> CS queue level preemption should respect user-limits
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2069
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Assignee: Mayank Bansal
> Attachments: YARN-2069-trunk-1.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-10.patch,
> YARN-2069-trunk-2.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-3.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-4.patch,
> YARN-2069-trunk-5.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-6.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-7.patch,
> YARN-2069-trunk-8.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-9.patch
>
>
> This is different from (even if related to, and likely share code with)
> YARN-2113.
> YARN-2113 focuses on making sure that even if queue has its guaranteed
> capacity, it's individual users are treated in-line with their limits
> irrespective of when they join in.
> This JIRA is about respecting user-limits while preempting containers to
> balance queue capacities.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
