[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14389749#comment-14389749
 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-3318:
-----------------------------------------------

Top level comments
 - It is not entirely clear how the ordering and limits work together - as one 
policy with multiple facets or multiple policy types. So we need to think more 
about what we expose right now
  -- let's split the patch that exposes this to the client side / web UI and in 
the API records into its own JIRA. We should do it a little later after the 
framework stabilizes.
  -- Capacity Scheduler Configuration also need more thought in terms of naming 
and layout. I think it's premature to support this as a publicly supportable 
configuration. But at the same time, to enable experimentation, we should 
simply not put in the public side of the code.
 - For future's sake and for discussion with FairScheduler folks, I think it is 
useful to split off CS changes into their own JIRA. We can strictly focus on 
the policy framework here.

Quick comments on the policy stuff itself
 - I also like SchedulableEntity better. If not that, simply Schedulable works 
too
 - You add/remove applications to/from LeafQueue's policy but addition/removal 
of containers is an event. I think we should be consistent with these two. May 
be invent some sort of a notion of parent/child SchedulableEntities and make 
this generic?
 - The notion of a comparator doesn't make sense to an admin. It is simply a 
policy. Depending on how ordering and limits come together, they may become 
properties of a policy?

> Create Initial OrderingPolicy Framework, integrate with CapacityScheduler 
> LeafQueue supporting present behavior
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3318
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3318
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: scheduler
>            Reporter: Craig Welch
>            Assignee: Craig Welch
>         Attachments: YARN-3318.13.patch, YARN-3318.14.patch, 
> YARN-3318.17.patch, YARN-3318.34.patch, YARN-3318.35.patch, YARN-3318.36.patch
>
>
> Create the initial framework required for using OrderingPolicies with 
> SchedulerApplicaitonAttempts and integrate with the CapacityScheduler.   This 
> will include an implementation which is compatible with current FIFO behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to