[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14498603#comment-14498603
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-3463:
----------------------------------

bq. No, applications still start as they did before, no reason to change it
May not, for example, when priority comparator enabled, how to activate apps 
could be determined by priority of the app instead of submission order. But 
it's a future requirement, we can postpone the changes to when they really 
needed.

bq. No, this comes from the interface definition and it's needed to enable 
another scheduler, say FS, be able to use the same code with their derived 
application types of choice
I don't think FS will use the CapacitySchedulerConfiguration, it's not a big 
deal, let's keep it as-is.

bq. So this configuration is not for defining the policy, that is 
"ORDERING_POLICY" (which is where you would have "fair", "fifo", etc), this is 
for configuration elements which may modify the behavior of the policy, such as 
sizeBasedWeight, & it's needed for that purpose.
Hmm.. That could be a problem after take a look at YARN-3319. IMO, Configure 
OrderingPolicy should follow the style of how we configure other modules, which 
is using capacity-scheduler.xml in CS and using fair-scheduler.xml in FS. For 
individual options such as sizeBasedWeight, it's better to make it to be a 
separated option instead of putting all of them together. And the 
configure(String config) for OrderingPolicy could be problematic, I missed this 
point while reviewing YARN-3318, how about change it to Map<String, String> to 
explicitly pass option_key=value pairs to configure OrderingPolicy?

bq. I'm actually not getting any there, I think because this is used for mocking
I can see while using eclipse, you can suppress them to avoid javac warning.

> Integrate OrderingPolicy Framework with CapacityScheduler
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3463
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3463
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacityscheduler
>            Reporter: Craig Welch
>            Assignee: Craig Welch
>         Attachments: YARN-3463.50.patch, YARN-3463.61.patch, 
> YARN-3463.64.patch, YARN-3463.65.patch, YARN-3463.66.patch, YARN-3463.67.patch
>
>
> Integrate the OrderingPolicy Framework with the CapacityScheduler



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to