[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vrushali C updated YARN-3411:
-----------------------------
    Attachment: YARN-3411.poc.4.txt

Hi [~gtCarrera9]

Yes, sure we can use hbase 1.0.1.  Attaching an updated patch that uses hbase 
1.0.1. It works fine for the unit test.

We will also have the hbase cluster set up with version 1.0.1.

thanks
Vrushali

> [Storage implementation] explore the native HBase write schema for storage
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3411
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3411
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>            Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>            Assignee: Vrushali C
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: ATSv2BackendHBaseSchemaproposal.pdf, 
> YARN-3411.poc.2.txt, YARN-3411.poc.3.txt, YARN-3411.poc.4.txt, 
> YARN-3411.poc.txt
>
>
> There is work that's in progress to implement the storage based on a Phoenix 
> schema (YARN-3134).
> In parallel, we would like to explore an implementation based on a native 
> HBase schema for the write path. Such a schema does not exclude using 
> Phoenix, especially for reads and offline queries.
> Once we have basic implementations of both options, we could evaluate them in 
> terms of performance, scalability, usability, etc. and make a call.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to