[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542718#comment-14542718
 ] 

Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-3306:
----------------------------------------

As I was asking earlier, can we work on a branch and merge in as and when we 
have a meaningful/complete parts? The code looks quite isolated and shouldn't 
be much overhead to work on a branch.



> [Umbrella] Proposing per-queue Policy driven scheduling in YARN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3306
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3306
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: scheduler
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>         Attachments: PerQueuePolicydrivenschedulinginYARN.pdf
>
>
> Scheduling layout in Apache Hadoop YARN today is very coarse grained. This 
> proposal aims at converting today’s rigid scheduling in YARN to a per­-queue 
> policy driven architecture.
> We propose the creation of a c​ommon policy framework​ and implement a​common 
> set of policies​ that administrators can pick and chose per queue
>  - Make scheduling policies configurable per queue
>  - Initially, we limit ourselves to a new type of scheduling policy that 
> determines the ordering of applications within the l​eaf ­queue
>  - In the near future, we will also pursue parent­ queue level policies and 
> potential algorithm reuse through a separate type of policies that control 
> resource limits per queue, user, application etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to