[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vrushali C updated YARN-3411:
-----------------------------
Attachment: YARN-3411-YARN-2928.007.patch
Uploading YARN-3411-YARN-2928.007.patch. I think I have addressed everyone's
comments. I have been going up and down scrolling on this jira page since
yesterday and I hope I have not missed out on any comment.
[~gtCarrera9] I have not yet moved the test data into TestTimelineWriterImpl
since it has almost a similar information setup for timeline entity but with
more cases. I can modify it later. I have tested the HBase writer with
Sangjin's driver code as well.
> [Storage implementation] explore the native HBase write schema for storage
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3411
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3411
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
> Reporter: Sangjin Lee
> Assignee: Vrushali C
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ATSv2BackendHBaseSchemaproposal.pdf,
> YARN-3411-YARN-2928.001.patch, YARN-3411-YARN-2928.002.patch,
> YARN-3411-YARN-2928.003.patch, YARN-3411-YARN-2928.004.patch,
> YARN-3411-YARN-2928.005.patch, YARN-3411-YARN-2928.006.patch,
> YARN-3411-YARN-2928.007.patch, YARN-3411.poc.2.txt, YARN-3411.poc.3.txt,
> YARN-3411.poc.4.txt, YARN-3411.poc.5.txt, YARN-3411.poc.6.txt,
> YARN-3411.poc.7.txt, YARN-3411.poc.txt
>
>
> There is work that's in progress to implement the storage based on a Phoenix
> schema (YARN-3134).
> In parallel, we would like to explore an implementation based on a native
> HBase schema for the write path. Such a schema does not exclude using
> Phoenix, especially for reads and offline queries.
> Once we have basic implementations of both options, we could evaluate them in
> terms of performance, scalability, usability, etc. and make a call.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
