[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14638219#comment-14638219
 ] 

Akira AJISAKA commented on YARN-3954:
-------------------------------------

bq. I suggest that this test case can be moved to hadoop-yarn-api. So any 
changes in YarnConfiguration.java will automatically trigger this.
Agree. +1 for doing this in YARN-3958.

> TestYarnConfigurationFields#testCompareConfigurationClassAgainstXml fails in 
> trunk
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3954
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Varun Saxena
>            Assignee: Varun Saxena
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-YARN-3954.patch, YARN-3954.01.patch
>
>
> {noformat}
> Running org.apache.hadoop.yarn.conf.TestYarnConfigurationFields
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.47 sec <<< 
> FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.yarn.conf.TestYarnConfigurationFields
> testCompareConfigurationClassAgainstXml(org.apache.hadoop.yarn.conf.TestYarnConfigurationFields)
>   Time elapsed: 0.068 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: class org.apache.hadoop.yarn.conf.YarnConfiguration 
> has 1 variables missing in yarn-default.xml
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.TestConfigurationFieldsBase.testCompareConfigurationClassAgainstXml(TestConfigurationFieldsBase.java:429)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to