[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14654130#comment-14654130
 ] 

Arun Suresh commented on YARN-3176:
-----------------------------------

Thanks for the patch [~l201514],

The patch itself looks fine. But, currently, I see that quite a lot of queue 
properties do not inherit from the parent. for eg. Min(Max)Resources, 
Preemption Timeouts etc. Should we broaden the scope of the JIRA to include 
these as well ?

Also, I was also thinking, is it right simply inherit the maxApp ? The queue in 
question can hog all the apps and not leave its siblings any. Should we use the 
queue share to determine the max apps ?

Thoughts ?

> In Fair Scheduler, child queue should inherit maxApp from its parent
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3176
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3176
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Siqi Li
>            Assignee: Siqi Li
>         Attachments: YARN-3176.v1.patch, YARN-3176.v2.patch
>
>
> if the child queue does not have a maxRunningApp limit, it will use the 
> queueMaxAppsDefault. This behavior is not quite right, since 
> queueMaxAppsDefault is normally a small number, whereas some parent queues do 
> have maxRunningApp set to be more than the default



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to