[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14693360#comment-14693360
 ] 

Junping Du commented on YARN-3212:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~sunilg] for the comments! I agree this is not a bad idea for node in 
decommissioning to give more chances for nodes just in UNHEALTHY. However, it 
will involve more complexities, like: how much rounds we should wait (heartbeat 
number or timing, a separated configuration?), an additional state for the node 
that is in decommissioning and unhealthy, etc. We should evaluate if it worth 
it before we have hands-on experience on this new feature. In practically, I 
saw rare cases that nodes can back to healthy state quite soon (unless get 
fixed immediately with people log in) - that's saying within the timeout. 
Thus, I would prefer to keep the current transition which sounds slightly 
aggressively but a good trade-off with simplicity at this moment. I can put a 
TODO in later patch (if other outstanding issues according to the comments) to 
think more on this when we back with more experiences. Make sense?

> RMNode State Transition Update with DECOMMISSIONING state
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3212
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3212
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Junping Du
>            Assignee: Junping Du
>         Attachments: RMNodeImpl - new.png, YARN-3212-v1.patch, 
> YARN-3212-v2.patch, YARN-3212-v3.patch, YARN-3212-v4.1.patch, 
> YARN-3212-v4.patch, YARN-3212-v5.1.patch, YARN-3212-v5.patch
>
>
> As proposed in YARN-914, a new state of “DECOMMISSIONING” will be added and 
> can transition from “running” state triggered by a new event - 
> “decommissioning”. 
> This new state can be transit to state of “decommissioned” when 
> Resource_Update if no running apps on this NM or NM reconnect after restart. 
> Or it received DECOMMISSIONED event (after timeout from CLI).
> In addition, it can back to “running” if user decides to cancel previous 
> decommission by calling recommission on the same node. The reaction to other 
> events is similar to RUNNING state.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to