[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14715222#comment-14715222
]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-3635:
---------------------------------
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch | 0m 0s | The patch command could not apply
the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL |
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12745158/YARN-3635.6.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / a4d9acc |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/8918/console |
This message was automatically generated.
> Get-queue-mapping should be a common interface of YarnScheduler
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3635
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3635
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: scheduler
> Reporter: Wangda Tan
> Assignee: Tan, Wangda
> Attachments: YARN-3635.1.patch, YARN-3635.2.patch, YARN-3635.3.patch,
> YARN-3635.4.patch, YARN-3635.5.patch, YARN-3635.6.patch
>
>
> Currently, both of fair/capacity scheduler support queue mapping, which makes
> scheduler can change queue of an application after submitted to scheduler.
> One issue of doing this in specific scheduler is: If the queue after mapping
> has different maximum_allocation/default-node-label-expression of the
> original queue, {{validateAndCreateResourceRequest}} in RMAppManager checks
> the wrong queue.
> I propose to make the queue mapping as a common interface of scheduler, and
> RMAppManager set the queue after mapping before doing validations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
