[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14716119#comment-14716119
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-3920:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | pre-patch |  16m 51s | Pre-patch trunk compilation is 
healthy. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | @author |   0m  0s | The patch does not contain any 
@author tags. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | tests included |   0m  0s | The patch appears to 
include 2 new or modified test files. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | javac |   3m 39s | The patch appears to cause the 
build to fail. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12752657/YARN-3920.004.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / 4cbbfa2 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/8923/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> FairScheduler Reserving a node for a container should be configurable to 
> allow it used only for large containers
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3920
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3920
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fairscheduler
>            Reporter: Anubhav Dhoot
>            Assignee: Anubhav Dhoot
>         Attachments: YARN-3920.004.patch, YARN-3920.004.patch, 
> yARN-3920.001.patch, yARN-3920.002.patch, yARN-3920.003.patch
>
>
> Reserving a node for a container was designed for preventing large containers 
> from starvation from small requests that keep getting into a node. Today we 
> let this be used even for a small container request. This has a huge impact 
> on scheduling since we block other scheduling requests until that reservation 
> is fulfilled. We should make this configurable so its impact can be minimized 
> by limiting it for large container requests as originally intended. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to