[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14901263#comment-14901263
 ] 

Hudson commented on YARN-4113:
------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8 #419 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8/419/])
YARN-4113. RM should respect retry-interval when uses 
RetryPolicies.RETRY_FOREVER. (Sunil G via wangda) (wangda: rev 
b00392dd9cbb6778f2f3e669e96cf7133590dfe7)
* 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/ServerProxy.java
* hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt
* 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/RMProxy.java


> RM should respect retry-interval when uses RetryPolicies.RETRY_FOREVER
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4113
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4113
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Sunil G
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: 0001-YARN-4113.patch
>
>
> Found one issue in RMProxy how to initialize RetryPolicy: In 
> RMProxy#createRetryPolicy. When rmConnectWaitMS is set to -1 (wait forever), 
> it uses RetryPolicies.RETRY_FOREVER which doesn't respect 
> {{yarn.resourcemanager.connect.retry-interval.ms}} setting.
> RetryPolicies.RETRY_FOREVER uses 0 as the interval, when I run the test 
> without properly setup localhost name: 
> {{TestYarnClient#testShouldNotRetryForeverForNonNetworkExceptions}}, it wrote 
> 14G DEBUG exception message to system before it dies. This will be very bad 
> if we do the same thing in a production cluster.
> We should fix two places:
> - Make RETRY_FOREVER can take retry-interval as constructor parameter.
> - Respect retry-interval when we uses RETRY_FOREVER policy.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to