[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15022480#comment-15022480
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4225:
----------------------------------
Yes, I was thinking the client would refrain from reporting on a field it knew
wasn't provided. However I think having a getPreemptionDisabled and
hasPreemptionDisabled methods exposed outside the protobuf is very confusing --
someone might call has when they should be calling get. Maybe a name like
"isPreemptionDisabledValid" or something would be more clear.
> Add preemption status to yarn queue -status for capacity scheduler
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4225
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4225
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacity scheduler, yarn
> Affects Versions: 2.7.1
> Reporter: Eric Payne
> Assignee: Eric Payne
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: YARN-4225.001.patch, YARN-4225.002.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
