[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15023375#comment-15023375
 ] 

Hudson commented on YARN-4344:
------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk-Java8 #717 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Yarn-trunk-Java8/717/])
YARN-4344. NMs reconnecting with changed capabilities can lead to wrong (jlowe: 
rev d36b6e045f317c94e97cb41a163aa974d161a404)
* hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt
* 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/fifo/FifoScheduler.java
* 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/capacity/TestCapacityScheduler.java
* 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/capacity/CapacityScheduler.java


> NMs reconnecting with changed capabilities can lead to wrong cluster resource 
> calculations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4344
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4344
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: resourcemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1, 2.6.2
>            Reporter: Varun Vasudev
>            Assignee: Varun Vasudev
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.6.3, 2.7.3
>
>         Attachments: YARN-4344-branch-2.6.001.patch, YARN-4344.001.patch, 
> YARN-4344.002.patch
>
>
> After YARN-3802, if an NM re-connects to the RM with changed capabilities, 
> there can arise situations where the overall cluster resource calculation for 
> the cluster will be incorrect leading to inconsistencies in scheduling.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to