[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15059322#comment-15059322
 ] 

Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-2882:
----------------------------------------------

bq. I would prefer the above proposal. Overcommitment/queueable are two 
different just approaches to handle "extra" allocated containers.
Makes sense. But what if someone wants to allow overcommitment of resources but 
not queueing of tasks at the NMs?

> Add ExecutionType to denote if a container execution is GUARANTEED or 
> QUEUEABLE
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2882
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2882
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Konstantinos Karanasos
>            Assignee: Konstantinos Karanasos
>         Attachments: YARN-2882-yarn-2877.001.patch, 
> YARN-2882-yarn-2877.002.patch, YARN-2882-yarn-2877.003.patch, yarn-2882.patch
>
>
> This JIRA introduces the notion of container types.
> We propose two initial types of containers: guaranteed-start and queueable 
> containers.
> Guaranteed-start are the existing containers, which are allocated by the 
> central RM and are instantaneously started, once allocated.
> Queueable is a new type of container, which allows containers to be queued in 
> the NM, thus their execution may be arbitrarily delayed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to