[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15096554#comment-15096554
]
Sunil G commented on YARN-2009:
-------------------------------
Thanks [~eepayne] for sharing the thoughts.
bq.I feel that we should separate out these two concepts into separate JIRA
Yes, these 2 cases will be handled separately. And yes, we need to see the
progress in YARN-4108 which tries to solve many of these issues. And I think a
great deal of locality also can be tackled in that.
So I think its better to go this ticket along with YARN-4108, correct. Because
we can leverage the advantages as you mentioned.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Devaraj K
> Assignee: Sunil G
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
