[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15183235#comment-15183235
 ] 

Steve Loughran commented on YARN-4696:
--------------------------------------

I should add that now I've started with some scale tests, my tests can't do a 
{{GET entity_type/appemptID}} and get more than about 750 events back. Is there 
an official upper limit on the number of events a single attempt can create? Or 
is this a limit in the web API? If it's the latter, is there a way we can do 
windowing here, otherwise you can't store large histories, even with the new 
store.

> EntityGroupFSTimelineStore to work in the absence of an RM
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4696
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4696
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>         Attachments: YARN-4696-001.patch, YARN-4696-002.patch, 
> YARN-4696-003.patch, YARN-4696-005.patch, YARN-4696-006.patch, 
> YARN-4696-007.patch, YARN-4696-008.patch, YARN-4696-009.patch, 
> YARN-4696-010.patch, YARN-4696-012.patch
>
>
> {{EntityGroupFSTimelineStore}} now depends on an RM being up and running; the 
> configuration pointing to it. This is a new change, and impacts testing where 
> you have historically been able to test without an RM running.
> The sole purpose of the probe is to automatically determine if an app is 
> running; it falls back to "unknown" if not. If the RM connection was 
> optional, the "unknown" codepath could be called directly, relying on age of 
> file as a metric of completion
> Options
> # add a flag to disable RM connect
> # skip automatically if RM not defined/set to 0.0.0.0
> # disable retries on yarn client IPC; if it fails, tag app as unknown.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to