[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15193627#comment-15193627
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on YARN-4757:
----------------------------------------
bq. As far as I know there is no standard for including port(s) in a DNS
entry.
The proposed solution better use SRV records and not just some stupidly naive
approach with A/CNAME records. SRV is built for long lived service discovery
using DNS and covers such things as port numbers, weighting, etc.
> [Umbrella] Simplified discovery of services via DNS mechanisms
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4757
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Assignee: Jonathan Maron
>
> [See overview doc at YARN-4692, copying the sub-section (3.2.10.2) to track
> all related efforts.]
> In addition to completing the present story of service-registry (YARN-913),
> we also need to simplify the access to the registry entries. The existing
> read mechanisms of the YARN Service Registry are currently limited to a
> registry specific (java) API and a REST interface. In practice, this makes it
> very difficult for wiring up existing clients and services. For e.g, dynamic
> configuration of dependent endpoints of a service is not easy to implement
> using the present registry-read mechanisms, *without* code-changes to
> existing services.
> A good solution to this is to expose the registry information through a more
> generic and widely used discovery mechanism: DNS. Service Discovery via DNS
> uses the well-known DNS interfaces to browse the network for services.
> YARN-913 in fact talked about such a DNS based mechanism but left it as a
> future task. (Task) Having the registry information exposed via DNS
> simplifies the life of services.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
