[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15204685#comment-15204685
 ] 

Rohith Sharma K S commented on YARN-4685:
-----------------------------------------

Initially thought to fix by calling another allocate call when ever there is 
node update event to 
{{RMApp->RMAppImpl}}. But there could be case where newly allocate call get the 
master container before RMAppAttemptImpl gets container allocated event. In 
such case, RMAppAttemptImpl should have handling mechanism. Like this many 
cases can occur. This option does not work.

Other approaches fixing this issue are recompute blacklist threshold EITHER for 
on node-added && node-remove event OR on every heartbeat for the *ALL* apps 
which are waiting for AM container allocation and update appschedulinginfo for 
{{amBlacklist}} 

> AM blacklisting result in application to get hanged
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4685
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: resourcemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Rohith Sharma K S
>            Assignee: Rohith Sharma K S
>
> AM blacklist addition or removal is updated only when RMAppAttempt is 
> scheduled i.e {{RMAppAttemptImpl#ScheduleTransition#transition}}. But once 
> attempt is scheduled if there is any removeNode/addNode in cluster then this 
> is not updated to {{BlackListManager#refreshNodeHostCount}}. This leads 
> BlackListManager to operate on stale NM's count. And application is in 
> ACCEPTED state and wait forever even if we add more nodes to cluster.
> Solution is update BlacklistManager for every 
> {{RMAppAttemptImpl#AMContainerAllocatedTransition#transition}} call. This 
> ensures if there is any addition/removal in nodes, this will be updated to 
> BlacklistManager 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to