[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15258023#comment-15258023
 ] 

Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-4808:
----------------------------------------

I briefly looked at YARN-4390, and commented there. A couple of comments here:
# We don't really need the ResourceUtilization fields. Reading them from RMNode 
seems very fair. 
# I am comfortable leaving numContainers volatile. 

Actually, since SchedulerNode has more changes coming, may be I should close 
this as a duplicate of YARN-4511?

> SchedulerNode can use a few more cosmetic changes
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4808
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: scheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: yarn-4808-1.patch, yarn-4808-2.patch
>
>
> We have made some cosmetic changes to SchedulerNode recently. While working 
> on YARN-4511, realized we could improve it a little more:
> # Remove volatile variables - don't see the need for them being volatile
> # Some methods end up doing very similar things, so consolidating them
> # Renaming totalResource to capacity. YARN-4511 plans to add inflatedCapacity 
> to include the un-utilized resources, and having two totals can be a little 
> confusing. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to