[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15302540#comment-15302540
]
Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-5077:
----------------------------------------
Updating the way we calculate maxAMResource seems like a promising way of
addressing this. Since we have had other issues with this (the most recent one
fixed as part of YARN-4866), it would be nice to take a more comprehensive look
at this.
> Fix FSLeafQueue#getFairShare() for queues with weight 0.0
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5077
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5077
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Yufei Gu
> Assignee: Yufei Gu
> Attachments: YARN-5077.001.patch, YARN-5077.002.patch,
> YARN-5077.003.patch, YARN-5077.004.patch, YARN-5077.005.patch
>
>
> 1) When a queue's weight is set to 0.0, FSLeafQueue#getFairShare() returns
> <memory:0, vCores:0>
> 2) When a queue's weight is nonzero, FSLeafQueue#getFairShare() returns
> <memory:16384, vCores:8>
> In case 1), that means no container ever gets allocated for an AM because
> from the viewpoint of the RM, there is never any headroom to allocate a
> container on that queue.
> For example, we have a pool with the following weights:
> - root.dev 0.0
> - root.product 1.0
> The root.dev is a best effort pool and should only get resources if
> root.product is not running. In our tests, with no jobs running under
> root.product, jobs started in root.dev queue stay stuck in ACCEPT phase and
> never start.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
