[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15309062#comment-15309062
 ] 

Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-4308:
----------------------------------------

[~sunilg], I don't think just fixing the existing tests to not break with the 
change is enough.  I would prefer it if we could test both what happens when 
the {{cpuUsagePercent}} is 0 and when it's -1.  Right now we're not testing 
that the -1's are skipped correctly.

> ContainersAggregated CPU resource utilization reports negative usage in first 
> few heartbeats
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4308
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: nodemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Sunil G
>            Assignee: Sunil G
>         Attachments: 0001-YARN-4308.patch, 0002-YARN-4308.patch, 
> 0003-YARN-4308.patch, 0004-YARN-4308.patch
>
>
> NodeManager reports ContainerAggregated CPU resource utilization as -ve value 
> in first few heartbeats cycles. I added a new debug print and received below 
> values from heartbeats.
> {noformat}
> INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.monitor.ContainersMonitorImpl:
>  ContainersResource Utilization : CpuTrackerUsagePercent : -1.0 
> INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.containermanager.monitor.ContainersMonitorImpl:ContainersResource
>  Utilization :  CpuTrackerUsagePercent : 198.94598
> {noformat}
> Its better we send 0 as CPU usage rather than sending a negative values in 
> heartbeats eventhough its happening in only first few heartbeats.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to