[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15398991#comment-15398991
]
Naganarasimha G R commented on YARN-5448:
-----------------------------------------
Thanks [~sunilg] for your thoughts,
Well yes its based on perception and its debatable, but my two cents not in
favor of your approach are :
# This is one off wrong configuration scenario for this if we add additional
columns, then in general usage(after correction) its not of much use.
# Currently there are only two resources which are getting monitored (cpu and
memory), what about other resources which in future we want to add? so adding
multiple columns for each resource for this purpose doesn't seem good.
# ??Admin can immediately notice that there are some label which are
not-configured or part of cluster resource?? : Well its anyway related to
Scheduler page if admin sees a warning in *parititon-by-queue-hierarchy chart*
IMHO it should be sufficient.
I would like to get the opinion of others too.
> Resource in Cluster Metrics is not sum of resources in all nodes of all
> partitions
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5448
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacity scheduler, resourcemanager, webapp
> Affects Versions: 2.7.2
> Reporter: Naganarasimha G R
> Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
> Attachments: NodesPage.png, schedulerPage.png
>
>
> Currently Resource info from Cluster Metrics are got from Queue Metrics's
> *available resource + allocated resource*. Hence if there are some nodes
> which belongs to partition but if that partition is not associated with any
> queue then in the capacity scheduler partition hierarchy shows this nodes
> resources under its partition but Cluster metrics doesn't show.
> Apart from this in the Nodes page too Metrics overview table is shown. So if
> we show Resource info from Queue Metrics User will not be able to co relate
> it. (have attached the images for the same)
> IIUC idea of not showing in the *Metrics overview table* is to highlight that
> configuration is not proper. This needs to be some how conveyed through
> parititon-by-queue-hierarchy chart.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
