-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lukas Ocilka wrote: > Yes, this was an expected reply. Is Klaus the only one who *has* an > opinion on that?
LOL, I guess not all people to follow such discussions week away from a product release, exactly when those changes can't be done and espacialy when the adrenaline makes you forget it was April 1st? :-) Talking seriously. The only change I would support is to get rid of the 2. Having a number in the source code and other ugly places is not good, it is too hard to get rid of it. It should be just YaST or yast or YAST, unless we want to stick to that YaSTX thing, then we should do the jump to 3 someday, otherwise it is pretty boring :-) Duncan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH8/tEzR62qWZ+QtERAuSeAKCh1Ehx6akpgKsjadg1bp+KoVA7sgCdGu5p 51SIAy5nDrsQ7+5FEbQFu2o= =hur5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
