Duncan Mac-Vicar P. napsal(a): > Klaus Kaempf wrote: >> It is my understanding that we will follow the same path as with >> patches: >> >> - products are not 'installed'. >> [their 'is_installed?' state is computed at runtime] >> - products are solvables and come in a .solv file >> - each product will have a distinct package (i.e. suse-release for the >> distribution) which lists mandatory packages (as dependencies). >> [this is required to enable 'rpm-only' software management] >> > Yes I am aware of that. Now I am trying to jump from layer 30 to layer 1 > and figure out the implementation of the APIs benji pointed out. > > This leaves us with one restriction, unless you have a installation url > as repo, you won't see any product (which makes sense). > > In that case the implementation of installed products would be to look > all products (coming from the repo) and give the satisfied ones. is that > correct?
I'm afraid this 'might' break (or needn't work correctly) in case of Upgrade from media (Installation->Upgrade) as we often do not have access to network-based repositories when upgrading using CD/DVD media. Lukas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
