On čt 4. září 2008, Ladislav Slezak wrote: > Stefan Hundhammer wrote: > [...] > > > Now I can't help that sinking feeling that there might be even more. > > If there is a significant number of cases where it makes sense to not > > enforce that sanity check (must have only one button or both okButton and > > cancelButton), we have to get rid of that check. But I still think that > > it's useful. > > My question is why is the failed check considered as a fatal error? Isn't > it rather a minor problem? Would be an y2warning message enough instead of > aborting the module?
I agree. Seems strange that such developer's error that could be considered cosmetic has such consequences. j -- Jiri Suchomel SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 960 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
