On Wednesday 23 September 2009 16:00:11 Martin Kudlvasr wrote: > > Only the name of the class does not convince me, may be the name > > YaST:ServiceResource::Base can be reused (there is already such class > > there) > > The YastResource name was chosen quickly as we knew it was going to be only > temporary. I personally have no preferred name. > If we are going to plan a transition, we should keep 2 names for some time. > Both service_resource.rb and YastResource can be used by plugins at the > same time. This way we can achieve a fluent transition.
What I mean, ServiceResource is a module, not a class. And there is already a empty class YaST:ServiceResource::Base there Duncan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
