Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett write: > > I have noticed the following: > > Our code depends on rubygem-relevance-rcov, which is a package that follows a > now obsolete github convention. I have packaged rubygem-rcov. > > Would it be feasible to replace it for this iteration?
I think it is not good idea to depend on tool which generate test-coverage. Why we should depend on it? Lets make it only optional dependence. I see it same problem like if every java package depend on FindBugs software. > > Also we have ruby-rpam which is based on > http://gitorious.org/opensuse/yast-rest-service/trees/master/rpam > > It seems now rpam is even released as a gem from its author (Sept 2009). I > have packaged it as rubygem-rpam, should we switch to it? I think yes, now it is good time to test possible regression in this package. > > Then we have ruby-polkit, which I would also look into make it a rubygem too. > But I have no progress here. > -- Josef Reidinger YaST team maintainer of perl-Bootloader, YaST2-Repair, parts of webyast -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
