On 26.02.2010 13:22, Josef Reidinger wrote:
> Michal Zugec write:
>> On 26.02.2010 12:36, Michal Zugec wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> I'd like to share my observation:
>>> I needed to share my javascript code between two files (it was form
>>> validation for new and edit action + some more)
>>> I created
>>> webyast-users-ui/plugins/users/public/javascripts/users_edit.js
>>>
>>> and included it into my files with <%= javascript_include_tag
>>> "users_edit.js" %>
>>>
>>> It's important to use $pluginname as prefix to be unique in whole project!
>>>
>>> That's it ...
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Michal
>>>
>>
>> And jsuchome pointed me to one ugly fact : strings are not translatable.
>> That's because .js file is not interpreted by rails (to apply
>> translation into <%= _("sometext") %>), it's just send as it is.
>> Any idea how to translate such string?
>>
>> Bye,
>> Michal
>>
>>
>>
>
> Reason is simple, you add javascript to public directory which is jsut
> served. I already look at this issue (not-supported browser js has same
> problem) and for me the best solution is to pass from view as parameter
> translated string as I don't see how we can use dynamic generated js elegant
> and clean.
>
Put string as a parameter? No, this makes code really ugly!
Just untested idea: what about rename file.js into file.js.rb (which is
interpreted and strings are replaced) - is it valid to include script
with .js.rb instead of .js?
--
Best Regards,
Michal Zugec
Software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: [email protected]
Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 960
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 296 542 374
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
