On Friday, February 11, 2011 03:43:11 pm Robert Schweikert wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/11/2011 05:24 AM, J. Daniel Schmidt wrote: > > On Thursday 10 February 2011 23:21:17 Robert Schweikert wrote: > >> Attached is a revision of my original diagram incorporating some of the > >> design style of the ASCII art above. > >> > >> Differences: > >> > >> - There is no lib common, the lib common layer of the ASCII art diagram > >> is implemented by a modularized layer called "Configuration Modules". > > > > You only gave it another name. > > I never said that the thing Thomas an I called "common lib" should be one > > blob, that any module has to load even if does not need it. > > Correct, but using "lib" as a name implies that this is one piece. A > library on the system is in one piece, you cannot load half of libc. I agree lib isn't a prefect name for it. Feel free to propose a better name. "Configuration module layer" or what ever.
> > <snip> > > > Reading your comments I really think that we basically meant the same, > > Yes, I think we are pretty much on the same page. That's why I attempted > to somewhat merge the two presentations of the architecture diagram. > > And it appears that I have succeeded. > > Robert -- Thomas Goettlicher SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
