On Friday 11 February 2011 15:52:32 Robert Schweikert wrote:
> With a good architecture diagram we should be able to [...]
^^^^
That's the point. Our ASCII art was just a plain copy of our offices white
board (with a little cleaning up). The "common lib" was on the board called
"SMC" in the first diagram and "SCM" in the second - but we knew what we were
talking about.
It was never meant to be perfect, just to have something to discuss about.
> If we can achieve this, then it will be easy for contributors to get
> started.
Sure. In our current discussion its about what and how we want to change
something, so we are in a much earlier phase here. I think that's why we did
not invest too much for a perfect diagram that is just a base for a discussion
and not developer documentation.
Ciao,
Daniel
--
J. Daniel Schmidt <[email protected]> SUSE Linux Products GmbH
Research & Development Maxfeldstr. 5
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) D-90409 Nürnberg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
