On Št 18. August 2011 17:10:50 Lukas Ocilka wrote: > Dne 18.8.2011 14:25, Josef Reidinger napsal(a): > > Ideas for other names: > > yast_agent > > configkit (there is still not enough kits :) > > yast_kit > > config_agent > > system_kit > > > > more ideas? Also singular or plural to unify it? > > One question that comes to my mind: Do we really need to call it > .*agent.*? Isn't that rather kind of API used for accessing (r/w) system > configuration files? Why not to base the name on the functionality it > provides? > > 1.) 'system' and/or 'config[uration]' in the name would say what it > provides. > 2.) I already have enough kits ;) Thank you!
Then follow the current fuzz and name it uconfig ;-) I would call it 'sander'. Stano -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
