V Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:35:00 +0200
Jiri Srain <[email protected]> napsáno:
> On 09/20/2012 02:02 PM, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, Jiří Suchomel wrote:
> >
> >> Wow. There are still several call of the script from YaST[1].
> >> Should we just remove them all or is some replacement needed?
> >
> > Please remove them. If replacements are really needed, we will
> > find out ;)
> >
> > I think for ISDN we need a replacement, but since we have no
> > maintainer and nobody is able to find out what the current
> > script is really doing, we don't have one :('
>
> Hi,
>
> you may hate me for this answer, anyway, first, thanks for finally
> dropping this beast!
>
> And, more seriously: SUSEconfig was used for stuff that should go
> (ideally) to RPM scripts as well as for writing the configuration.
> The benefit I see is not dropping the functionality, but finally not
> calling a set of script after package installation, even if it is
> completely irrelevant to the installed/updated package.
>
> For writing configuration (or in fact any case when YaST calls a
> specific SUSEconfig.<something> script), this script can still be
> called (possibly with a different name) if it is needed to keep the
> behavior (which seems to be the ISDN case).
>
> Making sure to stop calling the whole set of SUSEconfig scripts is
> what YaST should do.
>
> Jiri
But someone has to tell use which script calls are still mandatory
and which can be removed.
Or we can remove all by default and wait for bug reports for the
missing ones.
Jiri
--
Jiri Suchomel
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
Lihovarská 1060/12
tel: +420 284 028 960
190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]