On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:27:35PM +0100, Josef Reidinger wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:14:32 +0100 > Ladislav Slezak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dne 25.11.2014 v 10:51 Josef Reidinger napsal(a): > > > Is there reason to use new lambda syntax? > > > > Not really, our style guide does not mention this and the upstream > > style guide > > (https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide#lambda-multi-line) > > suggests using ->() for single line functions and "lambda" for > > multi-line. > > > > My approach here is: if it is not in our style guide, lets use the > > upstream one. And if we don't like the upstream default then adapt > > our style... > > > > I'm not strict here, if we decide to not use ->() at all I'm fine > > with that.... > > > > It can be intersting how others see it.
I think we should not reinvent the wheel, so we should follow the upstream style guide. Regarding understandability by newbies, I tried - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=-%3E%28%29 No luck, even on Google. See also https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2466433?hl=en&p=g_punctuation - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ruby+dash+greater+than Finds the answer, and also points to - http://symbolhound.com/?q=-%3E%28%29 -- Martin Vidner, Cloud & Systems Management Team http://en.opensuse.org/User:Mvidner Kuracke oddeleni v restauraci je jako fekalni oddeleni v bazenu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
