On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Ladislav Slezak wrote:
> Dne 24.11.2015 v 16:45 Josef Reidinger napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:47:24 +0100
> > Stefan Hundhammer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 24.11.2015 15:15, Josef Reidinger wrote:
> >>> Well, in OOP is also one more approach called NullObject pattern,
> >>> which is create kind if partition table, that in represent no
> >>> partition table.
> >>
> >> This is wrong on so many levels that I don't even know where to
> >> begin...
> >
> > I know it is a bit controversy, similar like Singleton pattern. I agree
> > that over use it is bad design, but I also think it works nice in some
> > situations.
>
> Null objects are used in libzypp quite a lot (e.g. [1], [2]).
But they are not used everywhere. Look for exceptions in y2log.
> The libzypp API is huge and IMHO well designed. Sometimes too many templates
> or "magic" boost patterns, but that's probably because I'm not an experienced
> C++
> developer. In general I like the API.
And that is why we have to manually maintain bindings? Those
bindings deal with exceptions as well and "catch (...) {}" is
commonly used.
My approach is KISS.
> Maybe we could ask the libzypp developers for their experience with such
> a huge API? To get some recommendations and early feedback...
I have already done so in the past and will continue to do so.
Regards,
Arvin
--
Arvin Schnell, <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Research & Development
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284
(AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstraße 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
